On 06/02/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 06 February 2007 10:14, Edward Yakop wrote: > > Very good points. > > > It seems both the diagram does not address test dependencies. I would > > assume from dev-model that the test dependencies are defined in > > [Bundle Descriptor]? > > Test is IMHO not a build time concern, and should be modelled separately more > like a Runtime Configuration (which is how IDEA actually treats it). Will try > to create some more diagrams with this.
We should support various integration tests inside an OSGi container - we can use the runconf-model to define the test setup, but will also need to define "scenarios", such as a sequence of injected events (ie. bundle events, service events, client events...) over the lifetime of the test. Btw, should the runconf-model show how configurations will be pushed to the bundles, or is this process specific to each bundle? Are there any configuration details that we could capture at development time to help during deployment? Also, can we split the code into a generic framework that can get wrapped up as IDEA / Eclipse / NetBeans plugins? Cheers, Stuart _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
