On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 13:28, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/10/11 Stefano Kismet Lenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Hi Stuart, >> >> I have added the a line with "--log=DEBUG" and I found out that the >> classpath option is not applied, in fact the resulting command line >> taken from the mvn max:run ouput is: >> Start command line [[/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk//bin/java, >> >> -Dfelix.config.properties=file:/home/kismet/Projects/isti.cnr.it/proximity/sail.driver.sad/runner//felix/config.ini, >> >> -Dfelix.cache.dir=/home/kismet/Projects/isti.cnr.it/proximity/sail.driver.sad/runner/felix/cache, >> >> -Dorg.osgi.framework.bootdelegation=org.apache.commons.*,org.apache.log4j.*,com.martiansoftware.*,com.thoughtworks.*,edu.uci.ics.*, >> -cp, >> /home/kismet/Projects/isti.cnr.it/proximity/sail.driver.sad/runner/bundles/org.apache.felix.org.apache.felix.main_1.2.1.jar, >> org.apache.felix.main.Main]] >> >> I wonder way that happens, could it be a problem with pax-runner >> classpath option handling itself? In fact I have tried to run the >> SNAPSHOT version of pax-runner from command line and if start it with >> --log=DEBUG and --classpath=<something> I get a "Start command line" >> with the wrong classpath. >> >> I further investigate and it seems that the classpath acquired by the >> OptionResolverImpl class but it never copied to PlatformImpl which is >> the class in charge of starting the new JVM. I have created a patch >> which doesn't pass the TestSuite but it actually works (I have tested >> by disabling the test in mvn). >> >> I hope that we can help you to fix the problem. > > I'm not up to speed on how pax-runner processes the various options > for the platform builder, so I can't say if this is the "right" solution - > will > have to wait for Alin to take a look
No problem at all :) > > btw, if you've signed up on JIRA then you should automatically have > commit rights, which means you could go ahead and commit it now > (please also open a JIRA issue for the original problem, and use it > in the commit message) I have opened the issue PAXRUNNER-168 > > at OPS4J we don't like patches - just commit directly, as everyone > will get notified of the change (in diff form) and can act accordingly > I have also applied the patch with commit r12951 _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
