Servlet specs 2.4. That's the one I was looking at. But I guess it is
the same in the other version of the specs.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Mark Derricutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was actually the servlet mapping issue that was the problem - as it
> causes Apache Sling to no longer work.
>
> Which spec were you looking at?  Reading through
> http://jetty.mortbay.org/jetty5/faq/faq_s_500-Servlets_t_Path%20Mapping.html:
>
> Path Spec:      /
>
> Will match:     /                path=       info=/
>                 /path            path=       info=/path
>                 /path/           path=       info=/path/
>                 /path/info       path=       info=/path/info
>
>                 /path/info.jsp   path=       info=/path/info.jsp
>
>                 /other           path=       info=/other
>
> From the ticket: "if the same servlet is registered in exactly the same
> manner to "/" and a request is made to "/foo/bar" the servlet path is set to
> "/foo/bar" and the path info is null" which doesn't seem to match the above;
> which implies that path should be "" and info "/foo/bar".
>
> Mark
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Alin Dreghiciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> The bug about the servlet mapping is closed as looking at the specs it
>> is an feature not a bug. I still have the welcome files problem, but
>> if that is not what blocks you then there is nothing more about Pax
>> Web that would require releasing.
>> Only maybe the usage of Jetty 6.1.12 but in that case you should know
>> that you can use Pax Web with any version of Jetty starting with
>> 6.1.3. To figure out how, read about here:
>> http://wiki.ops4j.org/confluence/x/PYBb
>>
>> So, let me know what do you actually need from 0.5.2.
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Mark Derricutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > 'lo all - even thou there's 3 issues against PAXWEB 0.5.2 [1] I was
>> > wondering if there might be an ETA of when they might get
>> > resolved/released?
>> >
>> > Mark
>> >
>> > [1] http://issues.ops4j.org/jira/browse/PAXWEB/fixforversion/10261
>> >
>> > --
>> > "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code."
>> > --
>> > Bill Harlan
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > general mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alin Dreghiciu
>> http://www.ops4j.org         - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
>> Participation Software.
>> http://www.qi4j.org            - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven
>> Development.
>> http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People
>> working on Great Projects at Great Places
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
>
> --
> "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code." --
> Bill Harlan
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>



-- 
Alin Dreghiciu
http://www.ops4j.org         - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
Participation Software.
http://www.qi4j.org            - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven
Development.
http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People
working on Great Projects at Great Places

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to