Section SRV.11.2 Specification of Mappings specifies that: • A string containing only the '/' character indicates the "default" servlet of the application. In this case the servlet path is the request URI minus the context path and the path info is null.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Servlet specs 2.4. That's the one I was looking at. But I guess it is > the same in the other version of the specs. > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Mark Derricutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It was actually the servlet mapping issue that was the problem - as it >> causes Apache Sling to no longer work. >> >> Which spec were you looking at? Reading through >> http://jetty.mortbay.org/jetty5/faq/faq_s_500-Servlets_t_Path%20Mapping.html: >> >> Path Spec: / >> >> Will match: / path= info=/ >> /path path= info=/path >> /path/ path= info=/path/ >> /path/info path= info=/path/info >> >> /path/info.jsp path= info=/path/info.jsp >> >> /other path= info=/other >> >> From the ticket: "if the same servlet is registered in exactly the same >> manner to "/" and a request is made to "/foo/bar" the servlet path is set to >> "/foo/bar" and the path info is null" which doesn't seem to match the above; >> which implies that path should be "" and info "/foo/bar". >> >> Mark >> >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Alin Dreghiciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> The bug about the servlet mapping is closed as looking at the specs it >>> is an feature not a bug. I still have the welcome files problem, but >>> if that is not what blocks you then there is nothing more about Pax >>> Web that would require releasing. >>> Only maybe the usage of Jetty 6.1.12 but in that case you should know >>> that you can use Pax Web with any version of Jetty starting with >>> 6.1.3. To figure out how, read about here: >>> http://wiki.ops4j.org/confluence/x/PYBb >>> >>> So, let me know what do you actually need from 0.5.2. >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Mark Derricutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > 'lo all - even thou there's 3 issues against PAXWEB 0.5.2 [1] I was >>> > wondering if there might be an ETA of when they might get >>> > resolved/released? >>> > >>> > Mark >>> > >>> > [1] http://issues.ops4j.org/jira/browse/PAXWEB/fixforversion/10261 >>> > >>> > -- >>> > "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code." >>> > -- >>> > Bill Harlan >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > general mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Alin Dreghiciu >>> http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open >>> Participation Software. >>> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven >>> Development. >>> http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People >>> working on Great Projects at Great Places >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> general mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> >> >> -- >> "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code." -- >> Bill Harlan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> > > > > -- > Alin Dreghiciu > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open > Participation Software. > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven > Development. > http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People > working on Great Projects at Great Places > -- Alin Dreghiciu http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People working on Great Projects at Great Places _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
