Hi Niclas, Well, I'm not that knowledgeable regarding licensing issues. I chose EPL because, it is the main license used in eclipse projects and looked business friendly to me. ALv2 is perfectely fine with me. I actually released Pax VFS under ALv2 ^^ I actually just want to use a license which permits usage inside MDSD frameworks such as Acceleo, openArchitectureWare and commercial products.
Cédric On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One more thing; As long as the stuff sits in /laboratory, I don't care > what license is in place. Once you are looking at releasing and moving > over to /projects then I am much more concerned. So no need to rush... > > Cheers > Niclas > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- Cédric
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
