On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Cédric Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Niclas, > > Well, I'm not that knowledgeable regarding licensing issues. I chose EPL > because, it is the main license used in eclipse projects and looked business > friendly to me. ALv2 is perfectely fine with me. I actually released Pax VFS > under ALv2 ^^ I actually just want to use a license which permits usage > inside MDSD frameworks such as Acceleo, openArchitectureWare and commercial > products.
Ok, so just bear in mind; You can not copy source code from other EPL projects if you go with the ALv2. It is Ok to use and depend on Eclipse bundles and other Eclipse APIs and subsystems. Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
