2009/4/6 David Leangen <[email protected]> > I just started using Pax Exam for a new experiment. I expected it to >>> be a lot harder to use than it was. >>> >> >> +1 >> > > +1 >
+1 .... just to continue the positive feedback :) I also just started using it last week. It's really nice!! > > The basics are all there, so additional features are additional sugar to > make things even smoother. > > BTW... > > I was thinking: sometimes I need to run automated processes in a periodic > manner, without having a 24/7 container. The lifecycle is essentially the > same: provision, start, run, shutdown. > > I wonder if it would be a good idea to use the current codebase for > something like a "pax process", and make pax-exam an implementation of that > more general project. > well the codebase already re-uses a lot of pax modules (url, runner, etc.) so the building blocks are probably already there - perhaps you could add a page to the wiki to start capturing ideas / use-cases for this "process"? then we can see how it relates to the current pax-runner / pax-exam, etc... wdyt? > > Cheers, > =David > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
