On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2009/4/6 David Leangen <[email protected]>
>
>>  I just started using Pax Exam for a new experiment. I expected it to
>>>> be a lot harder to use than it was.
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>
> +1  ....  just to continue the positive feedback :)
>

Kudo's ?? Reminds me of https://www.ohloh.net/p/pax-exam ;)


>
>
> I also just started using it last week. It's really nice!!
>>
>> The basics are all there, so additional features are additional sugar to
>> make things even smoother.
>>
>> BTW...
>>
>> I was thinking: sometimes I need to run automated processes in a periodic
>> manner, without having a 24/7 container. The lifecycle is essentially the
>> same: provision, start, run, shutdown.
>>
>> I wonder if it would be a good idea to use the current codebase for
>> something like a "pax process", and make pax-exam an implementation of that
>> more general project.
>>
>
> well the codebase already re-uses a lot of pax modules (url, runner, etc.)
> so the building blocks are probably already there - perhaps you could add
> a page to the wiki to start capturing ideas / use-cases for this "process"?
>
> then we can see how it relates to the current pax-runner / pax-exam, etc...
>
Yep, +1 for a dedicated wikipage as brainstorming.
Pax Runner's embed support dramatically increased over the lifetime of
drone/exam so i guess there's now a large field of new usecases for runner
and its sub projects.


>
> wdyt?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> =David
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>
>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>


-- 
Toni Menzel
Software Developer
Professional Profile: http://www.osgify.com
[email protected]
http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
Participation Software.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to