I'm looking at the new JUnit4TestRunner which does some fancy trick to start tests in multiple containers in parallel. I wonder if that's superceded by the new junit parallel test support which is provided by maven3. The reason i'm asking is because the test runner does not generate one test for each framework anymore, so there's no way to know a nice information about running tests on multiple frameworks.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 20:13, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > i am both, suffering from sickness + somewhat technically disconnected > from internet availability these days. So hope you can work things out > and we can start talking about some details later this week. > Some quick notes to Pete: > - API should still work (the goal), just be sure you include the > correct dependencies. For maximum compatibility, you may want to pick > the exam-container-paxrunner instead of ..-native. > just as Guilaume said. > This M1 is best to be eaten "from scratch" - at least this will result > in the most useful feedback. > This means: > Try to use the raw api with different test containers in your pom. > Just as the announcement says. > Nevertheless, i am also happy with concrete examples that show a > particular problem (say, publish the entire setup on github for > example.). > Again, this is simple when playing with it from scratch. > > The Goal behind Exam2 is to have a realy really solid foundation. In > Exam 1.x we had way to many fuzzy reports with connection problems and > stuck test runs. > Thats why we go from ground up here. > > Glad you picked this up. > Toni > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think you should try with: >> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>org.ops4j.pax.exam</groupId> >> <artifactId>pax-exam-container-paxrunner</artifactId> >> <version>2.0.0-M1</version> >> <scope>test</scope> >> </dependency> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>org.ops4j.pax.exam</groupId> >> <artifactId>pax-exam-junit4</artifactId> >> <version>2.0.0-M1</version> >> <scope>test</scope> >> </dependency> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>org.ops4j.pax.exam</groupId> >> <artifactId>pax-exam</artifactId> >> <version>2.0.0-M1</version> >> <scope>test</scope> >> </dependency> >> >> I'm currently starting on pax-exam 2 so i may commit a bunch of things >> in the coming days ... >> >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 19:09, Pete Carapetyan >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Toni, I finally got to where I spend a few minutes on this, so here is >>> what I did and here is what happened. >>> >>> 1. I wasn't familiar with the test cases that I referenced in >>> >>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam2/blob/master/it-regression/regression-native-felix/src/test/java/com/okidokiteam/exxam/regression/felix/plumbing/BareAPITest.java >>> >>> so instead I just tried running existing pax exam tests that already >>> worked. Is this correct or is the api different? >>> >>> 2. That didn't work anyway, because I used this in the pom per your comment >>> >>> "Nevertheless this M1 release is available as "2.0.0-M1" on Maven Central." >>> >>> did I understand this properly or was I supposed to use something else? >>> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>org.ops4j.pax.exam</groupId> >>> <artifactId>pax-exam-container-default</artifactId> >>> <version>2.0.0-M1</version> >>> <scope>test</scope> >>> </dependency> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>org.ops4j.pax.exam</groupId> >>> <artifactId>pax-exam-junit</artifactId> >>> <version>2.0.0-M1</version> >>> <scope>test</scope> >>> </dependency> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>org.ops4j.pax.exam</groupId> >>> <artifactId>pax-exam</artifactId> >>> <version>2.0.0-M1</version> >>> <scope>test</scope> >>> </dependency> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Gang, >>>> >>>> If you are interested into Pax Exam you might want to have a look at >>>> this developer release: Pax Exam 2.0 M1. >>>> >>>> Read more here: >>>> http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxexam/2010/11/15/Pax+Exam+2+Milestone+1 >>>> >>>> Toni >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Toni Menzel || http://okidokiteam.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> general mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> general mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> > > > > -- > Toni Menzel || http://okidokiteam.com > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
