On 28 April 2011 15:22, Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> wrote:
> *Stuart* > > 1) thank you for your response, and readiness to make a release! > > FYI, pax-construct 1.5 has been staged over at https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgops4j-754/ I still need to run some tests before releasing it to central (early feedback from others would also be useful) > 2) also, Achim Nierbeck http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/ mentioned > that Toni Menzel http://tonimenzel.com/ runs hudson for ops4j: > http://ci.okidokiteam.com/hudson/view/OPS4J/ > > 3) so I thought, may be you can help Toni to convert ops4j master pom into > http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails|org.sonatype.oss|oss-parent|7|pom > so all these projects can auto-magically appear on sonatype oss > and we do not have to bother you anymore :-) > > the poms already contain entries to push artifacts to sonatype, you just need to enable the appropriate profile: http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/ops4j/Releasing Toni's CI setup uses this to push snapshots to https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots/ > Thank you, > > Andrei > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies > From: Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]><[email protected]> > Cc: Ben Tatham <[email protected]> <[email protected]>, > General OPS4J <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > Date: Wed 27 Apr 2011 07:46:47 PM CDT > > On 27 April 2011 16:36, Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>wrote: > >> *Ben*, hello; >> >> 1) I noticed that you are the "author" of this project: >> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.construct >> >> 2) for the fun of it, I built pax-maven-plugin from git trunk >> and wow, the problems listed below (transitive dependencies) are gone; >> >> 3) any chance you could release this any time soon to maven central? >> <groupId>org.ops4j</groupId> >> <artifactId>maven-pax-plugin</artifactId> >> <version>1.5-SNAPSHOT</version> >> >> 4) if not, can you please let me know where do you publish your snapshots? >> >> Hi Andrei, > > Apologies, too many oss projects not enough time - I'll see if I can find > some spare time this weekend to stage a release. > > -- > Cheers, Stuart > >> Thank you, >> >> Andrei. >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies >> From: Andrei Pozolotin >> <[email protected]><[email protected]> >> To: Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> Cc: General OPS4J <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue 26 Apr 2011 04:20:27 PM CDT >> >> *Stuart*, hello; >> >> 1) congratulations on *OSGi in Action* >> http://manning.com/hall/ >> what I have seen on MEAE was very good. >> >> 2) did you know, OPS4J people are missing you :-) and there are 2 >> questions >> from like a year ago; can you please answer them now? >> http://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04469.html >> >> 3) basically it seems that you made maven-pax-plugin, but left out the >> ability to build complete deploy-pom.xml (mvn pax:run) with all transitive >> dependencies; >> >> was it intentional? omission? does maven-pax-plugin has any future? >> should we look for other tools? will tycho provide provisioning? >> what is good maven-centric provisioning plugin for osgi? >> and why? >> >> Thank you, >> >> Andrei >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies >> From: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> To: General OPS4J <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 06:26:52 PM CDT >> >> Stuart McCulloch ? >> >> Not sure if he still has any interest here. Not seen him around for a >> while... >> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Andrei >> Pozolotin<[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Toni: >> >> cool! thanks for getting back; >> then who is the "current living expert" who can answer this? >> >> Thank you, >> >> Andrei >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies >> From: Toni Menzel <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> >> <[email protected]> >> Cc: Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]> <[email protected]>, General >> Ops4j<[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 03:43:15 PM CDT >> >> Hi Andrei, >> yes, we do have knowledge of the Pax URL codebase. >> But i personally do not have any experience on Pax Construct (which >> maven-pax-plugin is part of), its pretty much unrelated to Pax URL and/or >> Aether. >> Also, regarding (2) i think the link is incorrect. (?) >> Toni >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Andrei >> Pozolotin<[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Alin, Toni, hello; >> >> 1) I just noticed you are primary authors >> here:https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url >> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url/blob/master/pax-url-aether/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/url/mvn/Handler.java >> >> and learned that you must be the authority in this >> area:http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=7650992 >> >> 2) can you please comment on the question below: >> "maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies" >> >> I just can not believe that maven-centric tool would not resolve them >> automatically >> by default while building deploy-pom.xml for "mvn pax:run" :-) >> what am I missing? >> >> Thank you, >> >> Andrei >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies >> From: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> >> <[email protected]> >> To: General Ops4j <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> Cc: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> <[email protected]>, Les Hazlewood >> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>, >> Bartosz Kowalewski <[email protected]> >> <[email protected]> >> Date: Sun 24 Apr 2011 01:03:13 PM CDT >> >> Bartek, Les, Niclas, hello; >> >> can you please let me know how did you resolve this: >> >> maven-pax-plugin and transitive >> dependencieshttp://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html >> >> I am still observing the same behavior: >> a) fist-level dependencies are resolved >> b) deeper dependencies are NOT resolved; >> >> this is in maven 3.0.3 >> >> Thank you, >> >> Andrei. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Toni Menzel Source >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing >> [email protected]http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> >> > -- Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
