*Stuart:
    *
    re: "1.5 has been staged over at
    https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgops4j-754/";
    <https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgops4j-754/>
    works great for my builds; (transitive dependencies getting resolved)

    Thank you,

    Andrei.


-------- Original Message  --------
Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
From: Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]>
To: General OPS4J <[email protected]>
Date: Sun 01 May 2011 09:20:24 AM CDT
> On 28 April 2011 15:22, Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>         *Stuart*
>
>         1) thank you for your response, and readiness to make a release!
>
> FYI, pax-construct 1.5 has been staged over at
> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgops4j-754/
>
> I still need to run some tests before releasing it to central (early
> feedback from others would also be useful)
>
>         2) also, Achim Nierbeck  http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/  mentioned
>         that Toni Menzel http://tonimenzel.com/ runs hudson for ops4j:
>         http://ci.okidokiteam.com/hudson/view/OPS4J/
>
>         3) so I thought, may be you can help Toni to convert ops4j
>         master pom into
>         
> http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails|org.sonatype.oss|oss-parent|7|pom
>         so all these projects can auto-magically appear on sonatype oss
>         and we do not have to bother you anymore :-)
>
> the poms already contain entries to push artifacts to sonatype, you
> just need to enable the appropriate profile:
>
>    http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/ops4j/Releasing
>
> Toni's CI setup uses this to push snapshots
> to https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots/
>
>         Thank you,
>
>         Andrei
>
>     -------- Original Message  --------
>     Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>     From: Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
>     To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     Cc: Ben Tatham <[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected]>, General OPS4J
>     <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
>     Date: Wed 27 Apr 2011 07:46:47 PM CDT
>>     On 27 April 2011 16:36, Andrei Pozolotin
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>     wrote:
>>
>>             *Ben*, hello;
>>
>>             1) I noticed that you are the "author" of this project:
>>             https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.construct
>>
>>             2) for the fun of it, I built pax-maven-plugin from git trunk
>>             and wow, the problems listed below (transitive
>>             dependencies) are gone;
>>
>>             3) any chance you could release this any time soon to
>>             maven central?
>>               <groupId>org.ops4j</groupId>
>>               <artifactId>maven-pax-plugin</artifactId>
>>               <version>1.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>
>>             4) if not, can you please let me know where do you
>>             publish your snapshots?
>>
>>     Hi Andrei,
>>
>>     Apologies, too many oss projects not enough time - I'll see if I
>>     can find some spare time this weekend to stage a release.
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Cheers, Stuart
>>
>>             Thank you,
>>
>>             Andrei.
>>
>>         -------- Original Message  --------
>>         Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>>         From: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         To: Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]>
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         Cc: General OPS4J <[email protected]>
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         Date: Tue 26 Apr 2011 04:20:27 PM CDT
>>>
>>>             *Stuart*, hello;
>>>
>>>             1) congratulations on *OSGi in Action*
>>>             http://manning.com/hall/
>>>             what I have seen on MEAE was very good.
>>>
>>>             2) did you know, OPS4J people are missing you :-) and
>>>             there are 2 questions
>>>             from like a year ago; can you please answer them now?
>>>             http://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html
>>>             
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04469.html
>>>
>>>             3) basically it seems that you made maven-pax-plugin,
>>>             but left out the
>>>             ability to build complete deploy-pom.xml (mvn pax:run)
>>>             with all transitive dependencies;
>>>
>>>             was it intentional? omission? does maven-pax-plugin has
>>>             any future?
>>>             should we look for other tools? will tycho provide
>>>             provisioning?
>>>             what is good maven-centric provisioning plugin for osgi?
>>>             and why?
>>>
>>>             Thank you,
>>>
>>>             Andrei 
>>>
>>>         -------- Original Message  --------
>>>         Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>>>         From: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>
>>>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>         To: General OPS4J <[email protected]>
>>>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>         Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 06:26:52 PM CDT
>>>>         Stuart McCulloch ?
>>>>
>>>>         Not sure if he still has any interest here. Not seen him around 
>>>> for a while...
>>>>
>>>>         On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Andrei Pozolotin
>>>>         <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>           
>>>>>         Toni:
>>>>>
>>>>>         cool! thanks for getting back;
>>>>>         then who is the "current living expert" who can answer this?
>>>>>
>>>>>         Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>>         Andrei
>>>>>
>>>>>         -------- Original Message  --------
>>>>>         Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>>>>>         From: Toni Menzel <[email protected]> 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>         To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>         Cc: Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]> 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>, General Ops4j
>>>>>         <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>         Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 03:43:15 PM CDT
>>>>>
>>>>>         Hi Andrei,
>>>>>         yes, we do have knowledge of the Pax URL codebase.
>>>>>         But i personally do not have any experience on Pax Construct 
>>>>> (which
>>>>>         maven-pax-plugin is part of), its pretty much unrelated to Pax 
>>>>> URL and/or
>>>>>         Aether.
>>>>>         Also, regarding (2) i think the link is incorrect. (?)
>>>>>         Toni
>>>>>         On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Andrei Pozolotin
>>>>>         <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>             
>>>>>>         Alin, Toni,  hello;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         1) I just noticed you are primary authors here:
>>>>>>         https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url/blob/master/pax-url-aether/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/url/mvn/Handler.java
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         and learned that you must be the authority in this area:
>>>>>>         http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=7650992
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         2) can you please comment on the question below:
>>>>>>         "maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         I just can not believe that maven-centric tool would not resolve 
>>>>>> them
>>>>>>         automatically
>>>>>>         by default while building deploy-pom.xml for "mvn pax:run" :-)
>>>>>>         what am I missing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Thank you,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Andrei
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         -------- Original Message  --------
>>>>>>         Subject: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>>>>>>         From: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>         To: General Ops4j <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>         Cc: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>>>>>         Bartosz Kowalewski <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>         Date: Sun 24 Apr 2011 01:03:13 PM CDT
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Bartek, Les, Niclas, hello;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         can you please let me know how did you resolve this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>>>>>>         http://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         I am still observing the same behavior:
>>>>>>         a) fist-level dependencies are resolved
>>>>>>         b) deeper dependencies are NOT resolved;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         this is in maven 3.0.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Thank you,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Andrei.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>               
>>>>>         --
>>>>>         Toni Menzel Source
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>>         general mailing list
>>>>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>         http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Cheers, Stuart
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>   

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to