re: why logback: because log4j is abandon ware
you can listen to what the author http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceki_G%C3%BClc%C3%BC has to say http://beta.parleys.com/#id=2288&sl=0&st=5 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: paxlogging road map: logback? From: Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> To: General OPS4J <[email protected]> Date: Mon 23 May 2011 12:57:34 AM CDT > I think one purpose of pax-logging is that you don't have to choose > the front-end. All apis are supported. > We could split the apis in multiple bundles, but that would make > deploying pax-logging even more complicated. > I'm not really sure to see the advantages yet. > > As for logback, I've seen several requests over the past months > without any clear indication of what would be the benefits vs the > costs (which I see). Can someone enlighten me ? > > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 02:08, Andrei Pozolotin > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Niclas: >> >> Great; thanks for letting us know; >> >> I would not go with "the same PaxLogging API bundle." >> >> for all the modularity of osgi - PaxLogging is not modular at all; >> >> I would rather see it broken into more bundles with ability to choose both >> front end api and back end providers; >> >> Thank you, >> >> Andrei >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: paxlogging road map: logback? >> From: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> >> To: General OPS4J <[email protected]> >> Date: Sat 21 May 2011 03:53:10 PM CDT >> >> Hi, >> I might actually work on this, as I have some logback requirement at >> work. Can't promise a timeline for it though. >> >> The most straight forward approach is to create an alternative >> implemention, i.e. have a separate bundle which uses the same Pax >> Logging API bundle. Shouldn't be too hard. Could also take opportunity >> to think through the Configuration side of things a bit more cleverly >> than was for the Log4j implementation. >> >> Are there any Jira issues posted already around this? I welcome >> feature requests... >> >> Cheers >> Niclas >> >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Andrei Pozolotin >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Guillaume, hello again; >> >> can you please let me know if logback is on paxlogging road map? >> >> like, making logging back-end pluggable, so it can be either log4j or >> logback? >> >> Thank you, >> >> Andrei >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> >> > > > >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
