Not much development on log4j, I agree. But all the features I needed, I've implemented them in pax-logging, so that's not really a problem for me.
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:01, Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> wrote: > re: why logback: > > because log4j is abandon ware > > you can listen to what the author > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceki_G%C3%BClc%C3%BC > > has to say > http://beta.parleys.com/#id=2288&sl=0&st=5 > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: paxlogging road map: logback? > From: Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > To: General OPS4J <[email protected]> > Date: Mon 23 May 2011 12:57:34 AM CDT > > I think one purpose of pax-logging is that you don't have to choose > the front-end. All apis are supported. > We could split the apis in multiple bundles, but that would make > deploying pax-logging even more complicated. > I'm not really sure to see the advantages yet. > > As for logback, I've seen several requests over the past months > without any clear indication of what would be the benefits vs the > costs (which I see). Can someone enlighten me ? > > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 02:08, Andrei Pozolotin > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Niclas: > > Great; thanks for letting us know; > > I would not go with "the same PaxLogging API bundle." > > for all the modularity of osgi - PaxLogging is not modular at all; > > I would rather see it broken into more bundles with ability to choose both > front end api and back end providers; > > Thank you, > > Andrei > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: paxlogging road map: logback? > From: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> > To: General OPS4J <[email protected]> > Date: Sat 21 May 2011 03:53:10 PM CDT > > Hi, > I might actually work on this, as I have some logback requirement at > work. Can't promise a timeline for it though. > > The most straight forward approach is to create an alternative > implemention, i.e. have a separate bundle which uses the same Pax > Logging API bundle. Shouldn't be too hard. Could also take opportunity > to think through the Configuration side of things a bit more cleverly > than was for the Log4j implementation. > > Are there any Jira issues posted already around this? I welcome > feature requests... > > Cheers > Niclas > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Andrei Pozolotin > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Guillaume, hello again; > > can you please let me know if logback is on paxlogging road map? > > like, making logging back-end pluggable, so it can be either log4j or > logback? > > Thank you, > > Andrei > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com Connect at CamelOne May 24-26 The Open Source Integration Conference http://camelone.com/ _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
