Sounds great. Your detailed findings match my first impression. Though the
documentation part is true. In general. :(

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote:

> OK, there are huge differences between pax-wicket and wicket-osgi.
> Only some for example:
>
> feature            | pax-wicket
>    | wicket-osgi
> infrastructure  | http-service
>  | war-deployer
> injection          | blueprint & spring beans and services | services
> only via @Inject
> configuration   | fully based on osgi-services                 |
> web.xml and jetty (war-deployer)
> classloading    | full support; also of internal packages via
> delegating classloader | simple classloader depending on dynamic
> imports somewhere |
> ...
>
> Currently wicket-osgi is not much enhancement over the classical
> "pack-a-war-and-throw-it-to-pax-web-war-deployer-approach". But if all
> you require is the old approach without a war and injection via
> blueprint this may also be a solution. I try to nail down the
> differences and enhance the "introduction" page to pax-wicket a little
> bit more to make it's features clear. I hope I reach the author and
> that we find a way to combine the efforts.
>
> Thanks again for the information and kind regards,
> Andreas
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the info Toni. I'll give it a shot tomorrow
> >
> > On Jul 3, 2011 8:16 PM, "Toni Menzel" <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> i notices recent progress on Pax Wicket (which is just awesome,
> thanks!).
> >> Now, i came along this : https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/wiki/Osgi
> >>
> >> Which in turn led me to this:
> >> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/issues/46#issuecomment-1493913
> >>
> >> Good info.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general@lists.ops4j.org
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>



-- 
Toni Menzel Source <http://tonimenzel.com>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to