BTW, I was able to run his examples in pax-wicket with only very minor
changes in under 10 minutes :D

OK; I've updated
http://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/paxwicket/Pax+Wicket and
https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.wicket#readme. I'll "translate"
some parts to English during the day :) But otherwise I think this
should be a good entry point. I hope it interests people enough to
jump into the mailing lists and IRC channels instead of writing their
"own wheels". Feedback and ideas for those "elevator bitches" are
highly welcomed.

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote:
> Sounds great. Your detailed findings match my first impression. Though the
> documentation part is true. In general. :(
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> OK, there are huge differences between pax-wicket and wicket-osgi.
>> Only some for example:
>>
>> feature            | pax-wicket
>>    | wicket-osgi
>> infrastructure  | http-service
>>  | war-deployer
>> injection          | blueprint & spring beans and services | services
>> only via @Inject
>> configuration   | fully based on osgi-services                 |
>> web.xml and jetty (war-deployer)
>> classloading    | full support; also of internal packages via
>> delegating classloader | simple classloader depending on dynamic
>> imports somewhere |
>> ...
>>
>> Currently wicket-osgi is not much enhancement over the classical
>> "pack-a-war-and-throw-it-to-pax-web-war-deployer-approach". But if all
>> you require is the old approach without a war and injection via
>> blueprint this may also be a solution. I try to nail down the
>> differences and enhance the "introduction" page to pax-wicket a little
>> bit more to make it's features clear. I hope I reach the author and
>> that we find a way to combine the efforts.
>>
>> Thanks again for the information and kind regards,
>> Andreas
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks for the info Toni. I'll give it a shot tomorrow
>> >
>> > On Jul 3, 2011 8:16 PM, "Toni Menzel" <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> i notices recent progress on Pax Wicket (which is just awesome,
>> >> thanks!).
>> >> Now, i came along this : https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/wiki/Osgi
>> >>
>> >> Which in turn led me to this:
>> >> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/issues/46#issuecomment-1493913
>> >>
>> >> Good info.
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> general@lists.ops4j.org
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
>
> --
> Toni Menzel Source
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general@lists.ops4j.org
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to