can you publish the exception in 2.1.0. I am close to publish 2.1.1 and would be glad to fix issues introduced in 2.1.
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Sanjeeb Sahoo <www.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I upgraded to 2.0.0 and it solved the problem. > > BTW, when I tried to upgrade to 2.1.0, I got some error related to > classpath protocol handler or something similar not found. I didn't > have time to look into it further, so I am using 2.0.0 for the time > being. > > Thanks > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote: > > Yes it has changed since 2.0-RC5. > > ( http://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-227 is your case ). > > Recommended: 2.1.0 > > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Sanjeeb Sahoo <www.sa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> This is why I say pax-exam-extender embeds slf4j api: > >> > >> ss141213@Sahoo:/space/ss141213$ jar tf > >> > >> > ~/.m2/repository/org/ops4j/pax/exam/pax-exam-extender-service/2.0.0-RC5/pax-exam-extender-service-2.0.0-RC5.jar > >> | grep slf > >> slf4j-api-1.6.1.jar > >> > >> ss141213@Sahoo:/space/ss141213$ java -jar > >> /home/ss141213/download/bnd-0.0.366.jar print -manifest > >> > >> > ~/.m2/repository/org/ops4j/pax/exam/pax-exam-extender-service/2.0.0-RC5/pax-exam-extender-service-2.0.0-RC5.jar > >> | grep slf > >> Bundle-ClassPath > >> > >> > .,pax-swissbox-extender-1.3.1.jar,ops4j-base-monitors-1.2.3.jar,slf4j-api-1.6.1.jar,pax-swissbox-core-1.3.1.jar,pax-swissbox-lifecycle-1.3.1.jar,pax-exam-2.0.0-RC5.jar,pax-swissbox-optional-jcl-1.3.1.jar,ops4j-base-io-1.2.3.jar,ops4j-base-store-1.2.3.jar,ops4j-base-lang-1.2.3.jar > >> Ignore-Package org.slf4j.impl > >> > >> I don't know if things have changed since RC5. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Sahoo > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> > wrote: > >> > Pax Exam 2 artifacts do not embed slf4j api, can you give a pointer > that > >> > leads to the evidence ? > >> > Instead, we do install some infrastructure bundles into the system. > >> > Those are: > >> > url( "link:classpath:META-INF/links/org.ops4j.pax.exam.rbc.link" > >> > ).startLevel( START_LEVEL_SYSTEM_BUNDLES ), > >> > url( > "link:classpath:META-INF/links/org.ops4j.pax.extender.service.link" > >> > ).startLevel( START_LEVEL_SYSTEM_BUNDLES ), > >> > url( "link:classpath:META-INF/links/org.osgi.compendium.link" > >> > ).startLevel( > >> > START_LEVEL_SYSTEM_BUNDLES ), > >> > url( "link:classpath:META-INF/links/org.ops4j.pax.logging.api.link" > >> > ).startLevel( START_LEVEL_SYSTEM_BUNDLES ) }; > >> > As you see, pax logging api gets installed by default. You cannot > change > >> > that currently (Pax Exam <= 2.1.0 ) > >> > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Sanjeeb Sahoo <www.sa...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Pl. update this thread with your findings... > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Sahoo > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Sanjeeb Sahoo <www.sa...@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > any thoughts on this subject? > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Toni Menzel < > t...@okidokiteam.com> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> I will have a look at this in the evening. > >> >> >> I need to check what the exam-extender service relationship to > slf4j > >> >> >> was > >> >> >> like. I recall some solution that benefits exam tests with any > >> >> >> foreign > >> >> >> (or > >> >> >> none) slf4j/paxlogging. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Niclas Hedhman < > nic...@hedhman.org> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Not sure about the details in this case, but in principle; > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> a. Do not include any logging APIs inside your bundle. > >> >> >>> b. Do not try to deploy any logging APIs as bundles on the OSGi > >> >> >>> framework. > >> >> >>> c. Import-Package the relevant logging APIs in your bundles that > >> >> >>> needs > >> >> >>> it. > >> >> >>> d. Deploy Pax Logging as the logging API and logging back end > >> >> >>> solution. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> In nearly all cases you will be fine. If you only use SLF4J it is > >> >> >>> practically certain you will be ok. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> I am not competent in Pax Exam to know if it has any nasty tricks > >> >> >>> up > >> >> >>> its sleeve for that not to work, but I assume not. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Cheers > >> >> >>> Niclas > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Sanjeeb Sahoo > >> >> >>> <www.sa...@gmail.com> > >> >> >>> wrote: > >> >> >>> > Sorry, I was wrong when I said the probe bundle embeded slf4j > >> >> >>> > api. > >> >> >>> > It's the pax-exam-extender-service bundle which is bundling the > >> >> >>> > slf4j > >> >> >>> > api jar. How am I supposed to supply an slf4j binding to it? Is > >> >> >>> > there > >> >> >>> > a fragment bundle made available in pax-exam project that I can > >> >> >>> > attach > >> >> >>> > to the pax-exam-extender-service bundle? > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > Sahoo > >> >> >>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Sanjeeb Sahoo > >> >> >>> > <www.sa...@gmail.com> > >> >> >>> > wrote: > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> I see the probe bundle actually embeds slf4j api jar. How can > I > >> >> >>> >> make > >> >> >>> >> it embed an implementation as well so that I can avoid the > >> >> >>> >> NCDFE? > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> >>> > general mailing list > >> >> >>> > general@lists.ops4j.org > >> >> >>> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> -- > >> >> >>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > >> >> >>> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk > >> >> >>> I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk > >> >> >>> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >>> general mailing list > >> >> >>> general@lists.ops4j.org > >> >> >>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> Toni Menzel Source > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> general mailing list > >> >> >> general@lists.ops4j.org > >> >> >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> general mailing list > >> >> general@lists.ops4j.org > >> >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Toni Menzel Source > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > general mailing list > >> > general@lists.ops4j.org > >> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > Toni Menzel Source > > > > > -- Toni Menzel Source <http://tonimenzel.com>
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
