you have this in your dependency list ?
<dependency>
<groupId>org.ops4j.pax.exam</groupId>
<artifactId>pax-exam-link-assembly</artifactId>
<version>2.1.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
?
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Sanjeeb Sahoo <www.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is what I get when I use exam 2.1.0:
>
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.52
> sec <<< FAILURE!
> initializationError(org.glassfish.fighterfish.test.it.SingleTest)
> Time elapsed: 0.004 sec <<< ERROR!
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.TestContainerException: Problem starting test container.
> at
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.nat.internal.NativeTestContainer.start(NativeTestContainer.java:199)
> at
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.spi.reactors.EagerSingleStagedReactor.<init>(EagerSingleStagedReactor.java:56)
> at
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.spi.reactors.EagerSingleStagedReactorFactory.create(EagerSingleStagedReactorFactory.java:34)
> at
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.spi.driversupport.DefaultExamReactor.stage(DefaultExamReactor.java:87)
> at
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.junit.JUnit4TestRunner.prepareReactor(JUnit4TestRunner.java:155)
> at
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.junit.JUnit4TestRunner.<init>(JUnit4TestRunner.java:79)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native
> Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513)
> at
> org.junit.internal.builders.AnnotatedBuilder.buildRunner(AnnotatedBuilder.java:31)
> at
> org.junit.internal.builders.AnnotatedBuilder.runnerForClass(AnnotatedBuilder.java:24)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.RunnerBuilder.safeRunnerForClass(RunnerBuilder.java:57)
> at
> org.junit.internal.builders.AllDefaultPossibilitiesBuilder.runnerForClass(AllDefaultPossibilitiesBuilder.java:29)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.RunnerBuilder.safeRunnerForClass(RunnerBuilder.java:57)
> at
> org.junit.internal.requests.ClassRequest.getRunner(ClassRequest.java:24)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:51)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:119)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:101)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ClassLoaderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:103)
> at $Proxy0.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireStarter.java:150)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireStarter.java:91)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:69)
> Caused by: org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to cache bundle:
> link:classpath:META-INF/links/org.ops4j.pax.exam.rbc.link
> at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.installBundle(Felix.java:2480)
> at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.installBundle(Felix.java:2436)
> at
> org.apache.felix.framework.BundleContextImpl.installBundle(BundleContextImpl.java:129)
> at
> org.apache.felix.framework.BundleContextImpl.installBundle(BundleContextImpl.java:107)
> at
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.nat.internal.NativeTestContainer.installAndStartBundles(NativeTestContainer.java:273)
> at
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.nat.internal.NativeTestContainer.start(NativeTestContainer.java:196)
> ... 27 more
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Stream handler unavailable
> due to: null
> at
> org.apache.felix.framework.URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.openConnection(URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.java:311)
> at java.net.URL.openConnection(URL.java:945)
> at
> org.apache.felix.framework.cache.JarRevision.initialize(JarRevision.java:155)
> at
> org.apache.felix.framework.cache.JarRevision.<init>(JarRevision.java:82)
> at
> org.apache.felix.framework.cache.JarRevision.<init>(JarRevision.java:60)
> at
> org.apache.felix.framework.cache.BundleArchive.createRevisionFromLocation(BundleArchive.java:868)
> at
> org.apache.felix.framework.cache.BundleArchive.reviseInternal(BundleArchive.java:549)
> at
> org.apache.felix.framework.cache.BundleArchive.<init>(BundleArchive.java:148)
> at
> org.apache.felix.framework.cache.BundleCache.create(BundleCache.java:251)
> at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.installBundle(Felix.java:2476)
> ... 32 more
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote:
> > can you publish the exception in 2.1.0.
> > I am close to publish 2.1.1 and would be glad to fix issues introduced in
> > 2.1.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Sanjeeb Sahoo <www.sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I upgraded to 2.0.0 and it solved the problem.
> >>
> >> BTW, when I tried to upgrade to 2.1.0, I got some error related to
> >> classpath protocol handler or something similar not found. I didn't
> >> have time to look into it further, so I am using 2.0.0 for the time
> >> being.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Yes it has changed since 2.0-RC5.
> >> > ( http://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-227 is your case ).
> >> > Recommended: 2.1.0
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Sanjeeb Sahoo <www.sa...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> This is why I say pax-exam-extender embeds slf4j api:
> >> >>
> >> >> ss141213@Sahoo:/space/ss141213$ jar tf
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> ~/.m2/repository/org/ops4j/pax/exam/pax-exam-extender-service/2.0.0-RC5/pax-exam-extender-service-2.0.0-RC5.jar
> >> >> | grep slf
> >> >> slf4j-api-1.6.1.jar
> >> >>
> >> >> ss141213@Sahoo:/space/ss141213$ java -jar
> >> >> /home/ss141213/download/bnd-0.0.366.jar print -manifest
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> ~/.m2/repository/org/ops4j/pax/exam/pax-exam-extender-service/2.0.0-RC5/pax-exam-extender-service-2.0.0-RC5.jar
> >> >> | grep slf
> >> >> Bundle-ClassPath
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> .,pax-swissbox-extender-1.3.1.jar,ops4j-base-monitors-1.2.3.jar,slf4j-api-1.6.1.jar,pax-swissbox-core-1.3.1.jar,pax-swissbox-lifecycle-1.3.1.jar,pax-exam-2.0.0-RC5.jar,pax-swissbox-optional-jcl-1.3.1.jar,ops4j-base-io-1.2.3.jar,ops4j-base-store-1.2.3.jar,ops4j-base-lang-1.2.3.jar
> >> >> Ignore-Package org.slf4j.impl
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't know if things have changed since RC5.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Sahoo
> >> >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Pax Exam 2 artifacts do not embed slf4j api, can you give a pointer
> >> >> > that
> >> >> > leads to the evidence ?
> >> >> > Instead, we do install some infrastructure bundles into the system.
> >> >> > Those are:
> >> >> > url( "link:classpath:META-INF/links/org.ops4j.pax.exam.rbc.link"
> >> >> > ).startLevel( START_LEVEL_SYSTEM_BUNDLES ),
> >> >> > url(
> >> >> > "link:classpath:META-INF/links/org.ops4j.pax.extender.service.link"
> >> >> > ).startLevel( START_LEVEL_SYSTEM_BUNDLES ),
> >> >> > url( "link:classpath:META-INF/links/org.osgi.compendium.link"
> >> >> > ).startLevel(
> >> >> > START_LEVEL_SYSTEM_BUNDLES ),
> >> >> > url( "link:classpath:META-INF/links/org.ops4j.pax.logging.api.link"
> >> >> > ).startLevel( START_LEVEL_SYSTEM_BUNDLES ) };
> >> >> > As you see, pax logging api gets installed by default. You cannot
> >> >> > change
> >> >> > that currently (Pax Exam <= 2.1.0 )
> >> >> > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Sanjeeb Sahoo <www.sa...@gmail.com
> >
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Pl. update this thread with your findings...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> >> Sahoo
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Sanjeeb Sahoo <
> www.sa...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > any thoughts on this subject?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Toni Menzel
> >> >> >> > <t...@okidokiteam.com>
> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> I will have a look at this in the evening.
> >> >> >> >> I need to check what the exam-extender service relationship to
> >> >> >> >> slf4j
> >> >> >> >> was
> >> >> >> >> like. I recall some solution that benefits exam tests with any
> >> >> >> >> foreign
> >> >> >> >> (or
> >> >> >> >> none) slf4j/paxlogging.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Niclas Hedhman
> >> >> >> >> <nic...@hedhman.org>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Not sure about the details in this case, but in principle;
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> a. Do not include any logging APIs inside your bundle.
> >> >> >> >>> b. Do not try to deploy any logging APIs as bundles on the
> OSGi
> >> >> >> >>> framework.
> >> >> >> >>> c. Import-Package the relevant logging APIs in your bundles
> >> >> >> >>> that
> >> >> >> >>> needs
> >> >> >> >>> it.
> >> >> >> >>> d. Deploy Pax Logging as the logging API and logging back end
> >> >> >> >>> solution.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> In nearly all cases you will be fine. If you only use SLF4J it
> >> >> >> >>> is
> >> >> >> >>> practically certain you will be ok.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> I am not competent in Pax Exam to know if it has any nasty
> >> >> >> >>> tricks
> >> >> >> >>> up
> >> >> >> >>> its sleeve for that not to work, but I assume not.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Cheers
> >> >> >> >>> Niclas
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Sanjeeb Sahoo
> >> >> >> >>> <www.sa...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> > Sorry, I was wrong when I said the probe bundle embeded
> slf4j
> >> >> >> >>> > api.
> >> >> >> >>> > It's the pax-exam-extender-service bundle which is bundling
> >> >> >> >>> > the
> >> >> >> >>> > slf4j
> >> >> >> >>> > api jar. How am I supposed to supply an slf4j binding to it?
> >> >> >> >>> > Is
> >> >> >> >>> > there
> >> >> >> >>> > a fragment bundle made available in pax-exam project that I
> >> >> >> >>> > can
> >> >> >> >>> > attach
> >> >> >> >>> > to the pax-exam-extender-service bundle?
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > Sahoo
> >> >> >> >>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Sanjeeb Sahoo
> >> >> >> >>> > <www.sa...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> I see the probe bundle actually embeds slf4j api jar. How
> can
> >> >> >> >>> >> I
> >> >> >> >>> >> make
> >> >> >> >>> >> it embed an implementation as well so that I can avoid the
> >> >> >> >>> >> NCDFE?
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> >>> > general mailing list
> >> >> >> >>> > general@lists.ops4j.org
> >> >> >> >>> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> --
> >> >> >> >>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> >> >> >> >>> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk
> >> >> >> >>> I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk
> >> >> >> >>> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> >>> general mailing list
> >> >> >> >>> general@lists.ops4j.org
> >> >> >> >>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> >> Toni Menzel Source
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> >> general mailing list
> >> >> >> >> general@lists.ops4j.org
> >> >> >> >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> general mailing list
> >> >> >> general@lists.ops4j.org
> >> >> >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Toni Menzel Source
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > general mailing list
> >> >> > general@lists.ops4j.org
> >> >> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Toni Menzel Source
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Toni Menzel Source
> >
> >
>
--
Toni Menzel Source <http://tonimenzel.com>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
