Hey Harald,

The best way is to search here [1] for Tracker.  The FilterTracker.java for
example is responsible for filter. PaxWicketAppFactoryTracker.java is
watching for the page factories.

Kind regards,
Andreas

[1]
https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.wicket/tree/master/service/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/wicket/internal

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 15:45, Harald Wellmann <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hmm, I get the idea, but I don't see all the details. Would be worth a new
> wiki page ;-)
>
> I can see the DefaultWebApplicationFactory in the sample, but I don't see
> any filter registration.
>
> There must be some component listening for WebApplicationFactories - which
> one? Does this component also register the Wicket Filter?
>
> Best regards,
> Harald
>
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:36:27 +0200
> > Von: Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]>
> > An: General OPS4J <[email protected]>
> > Betreff: Re: Pax Wicket Samples without web.xml
>
> > To bring it to the point
> > it's the std. HttpService together with the Pax-Web Whiteboard Pattern
> > Magic :-)
> >
> > If you want to deploy std. wars or Wabs you are in need of a web.xml
> where
> > the
> > War Extender of Pax Web will pick up the pieces for you and register
> > your servlets as http Services.
> >
> > Regards, Achim
> >
> > 2011/8/16 Andreas Pieber <[email protected]>:
> > > Hey Harald,
> > > All of the samples base on the HTTP service only which does not require
> > an
> > > web.xml at all. Instead of the centralized web.xml pax-wicket allows to
> > > conifgure filters and other settings in the web.xml in a more OSGi like
> > way.
> > > Currently there are no more advanced samples available but in short:
> for
> > a
> > > feature simply register a classical servlet Filter with the right
> > > application name. Both, the application as "plain" filters also take
> > > filter/servlet props as osgi properties.
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Andreas
> > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 13:59, Harald Wellmann <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I noticed the Pax Wicket samples - or at least the one in
> > >> samples/plain/simple - work without a web.xml deployment descriptor,
> > >> although based on Servlet 2.5.
> > >>
> > >> Is that a general OSGi Web feature or some special magic in Pax Web
> > and/or
> > >> Pax Wicket?
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Harald
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
> > >> belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro!
> https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> general mailing list
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > general mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > *Achim Nierbeck*
> >
> >
> > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> > Committer & Project Lead
> > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > general mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> --
> NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie!
> Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to