About the other project (Guess it was the Alchemist thing) , we have a step by step list that would possibly work here two. Name the involved Github User Names (skip that for already existing "committers"), write Project Name and proposed Jira short names and all that to the list.
If we get feedback from Karl and Harald in time, we (i for example) can create the jira projects quickly. ON THE OTHER HAND: what we also could think about, is an incubator model, that allows to integrate OPS4J projects in a less intrusive way. For example, not creating Jira Projects for each of them but just a "Sandbox" or "Laboratory" Project with Submodule=project name. That would also give us more time to rethink project partitioning (may be stuff fits into Pax Swissbox or OPS4J Base). Just a thought. Possibly will work on a wiki site for a new a Laboratory Phase using Github as SCM. Toni On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote: > well, there was another request for a new ops4j project but I'm still not > sure how we have to proceed now with the new infrastructure; might help to > document that process *hint @toni* :-). > > If we need/want a community vote... well here is my +1; I really like the > idea > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > > On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 12:32, Harald Wellmann <hwellmann...@googlemail.com > > wrote: > >> I've started working on a small project which is looking for an open >> source home and a friendly community, so OPS4J would be a natural choice :-) >> >> The working title is XVisitor: this is going to be a plugin for the xjc >> code generator to enrich the JAXB model generated from an XML schema so >> that users can work with the Visitor pattern on this model. >> >> A similar project is >> http://code.google.com/p/jaxb-**visitor<http://code.google.com/p/jaxb-visitor>- >> I'm currently using a patched version of this in some of my daytime >> projects, and based on that experience, there's couple of things I would >> like to do differently: >> >> * Support mixed content >> >> * No separation of Visitor and Traverser. >> (I do appreciate the design goal of this, but in practice I find myself >> writing too much boilerplate code for theoretical flexibility that I don't >> actually need) >> >> * Not just a single visit() method, but enter() and leave() methods for >> each model class, which are called before and after traversing the child >> elements of the current node. >> >> * The visitor methods have a return type of VisitorAction, an enum with >> values CONTINUE, SKIP and TERMINATE, which allow the user to skip a subtree >> or terminate the traversal prematurely. >> >> There is no relation to OSGi, so this project would not be part of the >> Pax family. In my sandbox, I'm currently using a package name >> org.ops4j.xvisitor and a Maven reactor inheriting from >> org.ops4j:master:2.0.0, with two modules, one for the plugin and one for >> integration tests. >> >> Potential hosting alternatives to OPS4J include jaxb2-commons.java.netand >> Google Code. jaxb2-commons might be the natural fit at first sight, but >> it doesn't seem to be very active, the procedure of releasing to Maven >> central is not clear, there is no CI server, and I'm not really keen on >> getting familiar with yet another OSS platform. >> >> Google Code is what I use for other projects. Biggest plus: Mercurial. >> Minuses: No CI server, no community, no automatic push to Maven central. >> >> OPS4J pluses: Great community, low barriers, JIRA, Confluence, Hudson, >> Sonatype OSS and Maven Central integration. Minus: Git. >> >> Oh well, if Git is the only price I have to pay for all the rest, then I >> don't really mind ;-) >> >> Best regards, >> >> Harald >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> general mailing list >> general@lists.ops4j.org >> http://lists.ops4j.org/**mailman/listinfo/general<http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > -- Toni Menzel Source <http://tonimenzel.com>
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
