+1 from me too; "Senior Project Admin" makes me somehow feels so terrible old :-)
Kind regards, Andreas On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 18:04, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Harald Wellmann < > hwellmann...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Am 05.11.2011 12:57, schrieb Toni Menzel: >> >> Hey Harald, >>> >>> great you consider OPS4J here. I think it would be nice to have stronger >>> non Pax projects in the community, also to broaden the area to non OSGi >>> projects. >>> >> >> Sounds good - and while I really like OSGi, there's still a lot of useful >> things you can do without it ;-) >> >> >> As of JAXB, haven't really worked with it in recent years, so cannot >>> really judge about the usefulness - if you want to say so. But reading >>> from >>> http://code.google.com/p/jaxb-**visitor/<http://code.google.com/p/jaxb-visitor/>it >>> looks like a worthwhile. >>> I would agree with putting it, specially using the name "XVisitor", into >>> OPS4J. >>> >> >> I've been doing a lot of XML document processing over the past couple of >> months which was greatly simplified by introducing a JAXB model instead of >> working on the DOM tree directly. >> >> I'm already using a modified version of the jaxb-visitor project to >> extract information from the JAXB models, so I do think the approach is >> very useful, provided there is a not-too-exotic XSD, and the documents are >> small enough to fit into RAM. >> >> >> >>> One question i have is, did you talk to the >>> http://code.google.com/p/jaxb-**visitor/<http://code.google.com/p/jaxb-visitor/>guys >>> already possibly merging the >>> two ? (mostly if you are improving the original project e.g. forking) >>> >>> >> Yes, I sent them a patch in April and they said they were busy with other >> things, >> >> The patch has not been applied yet, and there have been no commits since >> May. >> >> Anyway, by now I'd like to go into a rather different direction by making >> depth-first traversal with callbacks the default behaviour for the visitors. >> >> The design of jaxb-visitor is perfectly fine as such, but one size does >> not fit all, and I'm just trying to take a similar but incompatible >> approach which is better suited to my use cases. >> >> Regarding incubation, I do agree it would be useful to set up a standard >> procedure for this. >> >> Only in the case of XVisitor, incubation would be overkill... There's >> just 7 Java classes, plus integration tests, and I didn't start from >> scratch, but from a working solution. >> >> I'm going to create a GitHub repo for XVisitor in my own user space later >> today or tomorrow so everyone can take a look, and if there are no >> objections, a group admin could fork it into the org.ops4j space, set up a >> Hudson job and all the rest... >> >> Of course, as usual, I'm happy to do any admin stuff myself, once I get >> the required privileges and/or instructions from the senior project admins >> :-) > > > Sounds like a plan! At best set the project up exactly like how you would > like to have it appear in the ops4j space it best (including naming and all > that). > "Senior Project Admins" .. tsss ;) > > >> >> >> Best regards, >> Harald >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> general mailing list >> general@lists.ops4j.org >> http://lists.ops4j.org/**mailman/listinfo/general<http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general> >> > > > > -- > Toni Menzel Source <http://tonimenzel.com> > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
