We could branch from 2.3, can't we ? On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:52, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote: > Chances are higher that you will get it fixed and released with 2.4.0 final. > This depends on other RC releases (Pax URL). > So what we can do in short term is another RC called 2.4.0.RC2. Those are > totally valid and supported releases (distributed via Maven Central). > Would this work for you ? > > Anyway, since Karaf is "ok" with using 2.4.0 in their parts, i think cutting > a 2.4.0 is also close to final. > > I am usually not a big fan of maintaining old "bug fix" versions for > ancillary tools like Pax Exam. > ok for you ? > > Toni > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Ioannis Canellos <ioca...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I had an issue with pax-exam 2.3.0 which didn't work that well on Felix >> 4.0.x. I committed a fix on that on master and v.2.3.x. >> Can we get a quick release for 2.3.0? >> >> -- >> Ioannis Canellos >> FuseSource >> >> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com >> Twitter: iocanel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> general@lists.ops4j.org >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> > > > > -- > Toni Menzel Source > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >
-- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ FuseSource, Integration everywhere http://fusesource.com _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
