ok, that should not be. NativeContainer is in full control of the provisioning. Can you open the bug and describe the real behaviour as well as the behaviour you'd expect ?
Toni Menzel | Founder | Rebaze GmbH toni.men...@rebaze.com | www.rebaze.com Access To Alien Technology: Great software needs a great foundation. We help unlocking the next level in technology. Rebaze Pass for Maven <http://goo.gl/1YLlt>, Rebaze Pass for OSGi<http://goo.gl/WP8XT>, Rebaze Pass for Neo4j <http://www.rebaze.com/services/>, Rebaze Pass for Jenkins <http://www.rebaze.com/services/> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:00 AM, peter.gardfjall.work < peter.gardfjall.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Toni, > > actually I'm using the native container. > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.ops4j.pax.exam</groupId> > <artifactId>pax-exam-container-native</artifactId> > <version>2.5.0</version> > <scope>test</scope> > </dependency> > > My test looks something along the lines of: > > @Configuration > public Option[] config() { > return options( > /* Dependencies */ > mavenBundle("com.google.guava", "guava", > "13.0").startLevel(10), > mavenBundle("org.apache.commons", > "com.springsource.org.apache.commons.lang", "2.6.0"), > /* ... My bundles ...*/, > ..., > /* Test bundles */ > junitBundles()); > } > > @Test > public void getBundle() throws BundleException { > LOG.warn("Hello OSGi!"); > MyClass.someMethod(); // If a dependent bundle to my bundle is > missing I get a ClassNotFoundException here. > // although I would expect Pax-Exam to tell > me that something failed to resolve. > } > > Any ideas? > > best regards, Peter > > > On 08/28/2012 08:54 AM, Toni Menzel wrote: > > Quick question: i am assuming you are running the paxrunner container? > This is a blackbox to Exam. Yes a sanity run would help here. On the other > hand, that container is on the way out in version 3.0. > Or do you have this behaviour with the other containers? There things are > in exam control and should be handled in a better way already. > > Toni > > Please note: this message sent from a Mobile device. > On Aug 28, 2012 8:43 AM, "peter.gardfjall.work" < > peter.gardfjall.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I just noticed that Pax-Exam (2.5.0) doesn't fail/warn me when a >> test-provisioned bundle fails to start/resolve (missing constraint). >> In my case, I end up with a ClassNotFoundException when my test attempts >> to use a class from the bundle. >> >> I would have expected Pax-Exam to fail when a provisioned bundle fails to >> resolve. >> That would shorten the troubleshooting time quite drastically. >> >> I assume there is a good reason why Pax-Exam doesn't help me with this. >> >> Considering the lack of such help, is there a conventional way of making >> sure that all your test bundles are up and running as a pre-test sanity >> check? >> How do you Pax-Exam folks out there manage this >> >> best regards, Peter >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> general@lists.ops4j.org >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing > listgeneral@lists.ops4j.orghttp://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
