Great, thank you! Toni Menzel | Founder | Rebaze GmbH toni.men...@rebaze.com | www.rebaze.com Access To Alien Technology: Great software needs a great foundation. We help unlocking the next level in technology. Rebaze Pass for Maven <http://goo.gl/1YLlt>, Rebaze Pass for OSGi<http://goo.gl/WP8XT> , Rebaze Pass for Neo4j <http://www.rebaze.com/services/>, Rebaze Pass for Jenkins <http://www.rebaze.com/services/>
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:31 AM, peter.gardfjall.work < peter.gardfjall.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've submitted the following bug report: > > http://team.ops4j.org/browse/PAXEXAM-433 > > > best regards, Peter > > On 08/28/2012 08:54 AM, Toni Menzel wrote: > > Quick question: i am assuming you are running the paxrunner container? > This is a blackbox to Exam. Yes a sanity run would help here. On the other > hand, that container is on the way out in version 3.0. > Or do you have this behaviour with the other containers? There things are > in exam control and should be handled in a better way already. > > Toni > > Please note: this message sent from a Mobile device. > On Aug 28, 2012 8:43 AM, "peter.gardfjall.work" < > peter.gardfjall.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I just noticed that Pax-Exam (2.5.0) doesn't fail/warn me when a >> test-provisioned bundle fails to start/resolve (missing constraint). >> In my case, I end up with a ClassNotFoundException when my test attempts >> to use a class from the bundle. >> >> I would have expected Pax-Exam to fail when a provisioned bundle fails to >> resolve. >> That would shorten the troubleshooting time quite drastically. >> >> I assume there is a good reason why Pax-Exam doesn't help me with this. >> >> Considering the lack of such help, is there a conventional way of making >> sure that all your test bundles are up and running as a pre-test sanity >> check? >> How do you Pax-Exam folks out there manage this >> >> best regards, Peter >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> general@lists.ops4j.org >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing > listgeneral@lists.ops4j.orghttp://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
