Why only PC?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ding, Jian-feng 
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 10:55 PM
To: Clark, Joel
Cc: Kok, Auke-jan H; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Tizen General] Tizen platform development tools survey : dropping 
32bit linux support

Joel,

Whenever we have an official development and support plan for Tizen@PC, tools 
will support it. And it's also very possible 64bit :)

thanks
- jf.ding

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:59:24AM +0800, Clark, Joel wrote:
> It is disappointing that the tools for doing Tizen local builds are not 
> expected to run on Tizen.  I consider it an obvious hard requirement that 
> should be tested regularly.
> 
> Regards
> Joel
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jian-feng Ding
> Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 2:39 AM
> To: Kok, Auke-jan H
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Tizen General] Tizen platform development tools survey : 
> dropping 32bit linux support
> 
> Hi, Auke
> 
> The major reason of 32bit-linux-platform tools support dropping plan is the 
> qemu issue: we still have no stable 32bit qemu-static executable for current 
> Tizen, which is very important for the local build and image creation in 
> 32bit development systems.
> 
> And the future 64bit support of Tizen itself is only the last straw of it.
> Whenever the 64bit Tizen development is the necessary part of developers'
> work, they can only use 64bit development environment.
> 
> thanks
> - jf.ding
> 
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:47:54PM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Tomasz Olszak <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm opposed to this.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 64bit support in Tizen is not yet mainstream at all, as a matter 
> > >> of fact it's barely been implemented in 3.0, and no major release 
> > >> that developers can use yet has happened.
> > >>
> > >> Can we maintain 32bit code until most developers have had a major 
> > >> release on 64bit? It will be a significant amount of time until 
> > >> that really happens.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I think that question concerns development tools (gbs, qemu and so
> > > on) not the architecture of Tizen.
> > 
> > I was referring to this part that Zhang wrote:
> > 
> > >> As Tizen will support 64bit build in the future, which can only 
> > >> be built by >> using 64bit system, so it's recommended to switch to 
> > >> 64bit system ASAP.
> > 
> > My argument is that this motivation is somewhat premature - we want 
> > to use the tools on tizen itself (Zhang is not disputing that, nor 
> > am I) but the notion that 64bit support in Tizen itself is mature 
> > and everyone is using it (and gbs/mic on it) is obviously false.
> > 
> > From that follows that 64bit tools on Tizen could not have been 
> > extensively been tested. So why remove support for 32bit tools that 
> > are being tested and used right now if nobody is yet using and 
> > testing on 64bit? Sounds premature to me - the word "ASAP" certainly is.
> > 
> > Auke
> > _______________________________________________
> > General mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general

Reply via email to