On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Jan-Simon Möller <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Yes, that's the point. We had exactly this problem before - libudev > > > SONAME was bumped from 0 to 1 - and this does require complete rebuild, > > > unfortunately. > > > > OK, let's see what the tools team answers, I am also interested to hear > > how this class of problems can be solved. I guess few people would need > > OBS access, and few people would actually want to deal with OBS > > directly. So at very least some people could get a playground OBS > > project for things like this. > > > > Or may be the tools team will offer a way to solve the problem without > > direct OBS access... Let's see. > > I see for this type of integration testing access to OBS as key. > Not only does it speed up the individual testing process, but also it > facilitates collaborative work. GBS is good as first shot test. But not > for a > broader collaboration and testing. > > We should use the tools according to their strengths - GBS for easy > building > of a small number of packages into a testable image and OBS for integration > and platform work. > Agreed. There are couple of other points also to consider here. As GBS is used for local building (usually) we don't have to worry about it for building a small number of packages and when the scenarios is for integration testing building to resolve the dependencies as well, the question arises : 1) How scalable is the OBS server ? 2) If number of developers who are in need of OBS account access, increases, then will OBS server be capable of handling this entire load ? > HTH. > > My 0,02€ . > > Best, > Jan-Simon > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general > -- Thanks and Best Regards, N Ravi
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
