-- Dipl.-Ing. Jan-Simon Möller
[email protected] On Friday 04 October 2013 10:27:08 ravi nanjundappa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Jan-Simon Möller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yes, that's the point. We had exactly this problem before - libudev > > > > SONAME was bumped from 0 to 1 - and this does require complete > > > > rebuild, > > > > unfortunately. > > > > > > OK, let's see what the tools team answers, I am also interested to hear > > > how this class of problems can be solved. I guess few people would need > > > OBS access, and few people would actually want to deal with OBS > > > directly. So at very least some people could get a playground OBS > > > project for things like this. > > > > > > Or may be the tools team will offer a way to solve the problem without > > > direct OBS access... Let's see. > > > > I see for this type of integration testing access to OBS as key. > > Not only does it speed up the individual testing process, but also it > > facilitates collaborative work. GBS is good as first shot test. But not > > for a > > broader collaboration and testing. > > > > We should use the tools according to their strengths - GBS for easy > > building > > of a small number of packages into a testable image and OBS for > > integration > > and platform work. > > Agreed. There are couple of other points also to consider here. As GBS is > used for local building (usually) we don't have to worry about it for > building a small number of packages and when the scenarios is for > integration testing building to resolve the dependencies as well, the > question arises : > > 1) How scalable is the OBS server ? > 2) If number of developers who are in need of OBS account access, > increases, then will OBS server be capable of handling this entire load ? Just take a look here: build.opensuse.org That should answer 1 & 2 . _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
