Does anyone know the driving reason behind the, err, eventual mandatory conversion to SVN? I know CVS has some limitations, but.... Is it just easier on Infrastructure? Security? Performance? The reasons on the SVN main page don't seem that compelling to me.
No compelling reasons, I agree. However, as more and more projects move to SVN, infrastructure@ seems keen on pushing everyone to move to SVN in order to drop their support for CVS, which is quite understandable from their POV. End of this year has been floated around as a deadline. However, it's not yet an official deadline.
I suggest we aim for the 1st of July for the move.
-- Ceki G�lc�
The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/
