OK, so a July 1st deadline sounds good. Sub projects can coordinate their conversion at their convenience around whatever project milestones they might have.
We should continue to look at the GUI/IDE issues with Subversion. I have to believe that these are going to evolve. Any other comments or concerns? -Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Ceki G�lc� [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:25 AM > To: Logging General > Subject: Re: Subversion Conversion > > At 06:30 AM 2/24/2005, Paul Smith wrote: > >Does anyone know the driving reason behind the, err, eventual mandatory > >conversion to SVN? I know CVS has some limitations, but.... Is it just > >easier on Infrastructure? Security? Performance? The reasons on the SVN > >main page don't seem that compelling to me. > > No compelling reasons, I agree. However, as more and more projects move to > SVN, infrastructure@ seems keen on pushing everyone to move to SVN in > order > to drop their support for CVS, which is quite understandable from their > POV. End of this year has been floated around as a deadline. However, it's > not yet an official deadline. > > I suggest we aim for the 1st of July for the move. > > > -- > Ceki G�lc� > > The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/
