Henri, et al,

I believe we are good to go for the migration, with the following changes:

logging-sandbox : Move the existing cvs dirs into a "log4j" subdir.

logging-site : We need the branches and tags moved over from the cvs repo. Also, please double check the settings on this repo as I could only checkout using http, not https. No one else seemed to have this issue, just me.

You had also previously mentioned something about a "core" repo yet to be converted. I don't know what that one is.

Let us know what the next steps will be. With the above, we are ready to go (finally).

much appreciated,
-Mark

----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Womack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Logging General" <[email protected]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:31 PM
Subject: CVS -> SVN Migration Status


chainsaw - Build process verified (Scott)

log4jcxx - Repository reviewed, still need to verify the build process (Curt todo).

log4j - Build process for the head and the 1_2branch verified for the classes/jars. Still need to verify the dist builds which are dependent on the logging-site repository (see below). (Mark)

log4net - Build process verified (Nicko)

sandbox - Build process verified. But when we move it for real we want to move the current code into a sandbox/log4j subdir if we can. If not, then we'll just do it manually after the migration. The sandbox will be shared by all of the subprojects. (Mark)

site - I still cannot check out the site. Is anyone else encountering this, or is it just me? My cygwin svn command line client works fine with all of the other repositories except for logging-site. I'll try a different client tomorrow evening.

Thanks everyone. With hurricane Rita bearing down on Curt's location we may be delayed in completing the entire migration. But we are almost there and things are looking good (except for Rita, of course).

-Mark




Reply via email to