Looks good to me. I just have one question about the sandbox. I had to
check out
http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/logging/sandbox/log4j/trunk
to get the code. Does this mean that each subproject will have a
"log4XYZ/trunk" and they will need to be checked out individually? I can't
do a checkout of all the sandbox projects at one time?
If so, I guess that is ok. I was thinking all the subprojects would share
one sandbox repository. The thought being that cross-project experiments
would be easier to do in a single sandbox. In practice I don't know how
likely that will be.
I am still go for the conversion. We can muck around with sandbox later.
I will check back Saturday night for a status and will work to update the
site with the new repository info.
thanks,
-Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark Womack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Logging General" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status
http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/logging/
I repeated the migration, log4j-sandbox now found in
logging/sandbox/log4j, and the site now keeps its branches/tags.
See how it looks, unless I hear otherwise I'll go ahead and do the real
migration at 8pm on Saturday US/Eastern.
Hen
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Mark Womack wrote:
Henri, et al,
I believe we are good to go for the migration, with the following
changes:
logging-sandbox : Move the existing cvs dirs into a "log4j" subdir.
logging-site : We need the branches and tags moved over from the cvs
repo. Also, please double check the settings on this repo as I could only
checkout using http, not https. No one else seemed to have this issue,
just me.
You had also previously mentioned something about a "core" repo yet to be
converted. I don't know what that one is.
Let us know what the next steps will be. With the above, we are ready to
go (finally).
much appreciated,
-Mark
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Womack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Logging General" <[email protected]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:31 PM
Subject: CVS -> SVN Migration Status
chainsaw - Build process verified (Scott)
log4jcxx - Repository reviewed, still need to verify the build process
(Curt todo).
log4j - Build process for the head and the 1_2branch verified for the
classes/jars. Still need to verify the dist builds which are dependent
on the logging-site repository (see below). (Mark)
log4net - Build process verified (Nicko)
sandbox - Build process verified. But when we move it for real we want
to move the current code into a sandbox/log4j subdir if we can. If not,
then we'll just do it manually after the migration. The sandbox will be
shared by all of the subprojects. (Mark)
site - I still cannot check out the site. Is anyone else encountering
this, or is it just me? My cygwin svn command line client works fine
with all of the other repositories except for logging-site. I'll try a
different client tomorrow evening.
Thanks everyone. With hurricane Rita bearing down on Curt's location we
may be delayed in completing the entire migration. But we are almost
there and things are looking good (except for Rita, of course).
-Mark
