Based on your other answers I'm in favor of going with option 1. I think we should start by having infra set up a loggingtest site. and then see if we can't get Ivan's build to work (preferably in English).
Ralph On May 20, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > ok, so it's a custom rendering engine > > so I see 2 solutions: > > 1. either infra adds this engine as external, like it did with "mvn site": > you'll have to put sources in content, to trigger html generation on each > source update, buildbot will build the html, then you'll use the CMS web > interface to publish staged content > > 2. either infra simply adds svnpubsub, without any CMS integration, ie any > source modification integration nor html build from sources. I don't know if > they do that. But that way, you're completely free, you only use svnpubsub: > it's up to you to get the tooling to put html content to svn. > > With 1st solution, main site is automatically published at each commit, each > component being protected from erase by extpath.txt. > With 2nd solution, main site is manually published when somebody does it, > like components during releases, and you'll have to take care of not removing > components content when publishing. > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le dimanche 20 mai 2012 12:53:27 Ralph Goers a écrit : > Here was what Ivan proposed - > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/logging-general/201205.mbox/ajax/%3CCAKpWnhTiVEe0M54UOFHGXTUOPq3TX2Jd_Z-a7B9H_pfnxQmCDg%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > Ralph > > On May 20, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > I'm now subscribed to general@logging > Thanks Ralph for INFRA-4669: it gives me good information on actual status. > > The main question IMHO for the moment is: how are you planning to generate > main site html? Maven, CMS's markdown, another tool? > Then each component will have its own generation tool, with the only > expectation is to output html to svn > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le dimanche 20 mai 2012 11:58:16 Ralph Goers a écrit : > If you meant me, of course I'm subscribed to Maven Dev as I'm on the PMC. > However, I haven't done any work there in a very long time. This list would > seem to be more appropriate for a logging related discussion. > > > To reiterate a bit for Hervé's sake, I've opened > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4699 which is sort of in a state > of limbo waiting for us to tell infra what we actually want. We haven't > responded because we aren't really sure. So the first piece we need is > something to tell infra so that we can actually start doing something. > > Ralph > > > >
