Ivan, Were you able to get a test site to work yet?
Ralph On May 22, 2012, at 5:52 AM, Ivan Habunek wrote: > Yeah, sorry I haven't been more involved in the discussion. I've been to the > phpday conference in Verona, and haven't had time to catch up. > > I posted a comment to the INFRA ticket with the required information. I'll > keep in the loop from now on to answer any other questions. > > Regards, > Ivan > > > On 22 May 2012 13:40, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > Ivan, > > Daniel has updated the Jira and asked "Can you provide a list of dependencies > of your site's build process? (as port names -- see www.freshports.org -- > for those deps that are in ports)" > > Since you have actually built the test site could you possibly help with > this? The issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4699. > > Ralph > > On May 2, 2012, at 2:11 AM, Ivan Habunek <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I was away for a bit so I didn't comment earlier. >> >> My idea is to generate the site using Twig [1], a nice PHP templating >> engine, in combination with Textile markup [2], which is much more versatile >> than most other common markup languages (such as markdown, apt, ...). >> >> I have already converted the logging web site. The code can be found here: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/branches/experimental-twig-textile/ >> >> And I have deployed the generated web for demo here: >> http://bezdomni.net/logging/ >> >> This idea is obviously not compatible with the Apache CMS solution. Frankly, >> I would prefer this solution to the CMS since, from what I have seen, the >> CMS is quite a pain to use. >> >> Regards, >> Ivan >> >> [1] http://twig.sensiolabs.org/ >> [2] http://textile.sitemonks.com/ >> >> >> On 2 May 2012 10:44, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > On Apr 20, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> > >> > >> > What i thought was, why not to clean it up? Your proposed solutions >> > seem to be the cleanest way and updating everything just when we need >> > an update to the main site feels somehow wrong >> > >> > >> > Joe has now proposed using the CMS for the main Logging web site along >> > with expaths.txt + svnpubsub for each sub-project. Each sub-project would >> > then use svn externals so they could be independently managed. This sounds >> > perfect to me. >> >> OK I understand svn externals is like "symlinks for svn". Sounds ok. >> >> I am a bit concerned on the CMS. Ivan has put much effort in the website >> design: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/branches/experimental-redesign/src/site/pages/ >> >> I will ask infra (on the ticket) if it is possible to either use that >> design for the CMS or if we can bypass the CMS feature for this one >> too... >> >> Cheers >> Christian >> >> >> > Ralph >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> https://www.timeandbill.de >> >
