Sounds good, just shorten that up a bit for the report. See the other
reports for language style, etc.
Something to the effect of:
Lucy is a loose C port of Lucene for XXXXX. Progress has been made on
designing/implementing the various
interfaces.
And maybe, if you have them, some thoughts on efforts to bring in more
contributors/community.
On Sep 14, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:26:04PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I think Lucy is the only one outstanding at this point.
Oh, believe me, I haven't forgotten! I've been planning for this
mid-September review for six months. The goal is to have finished
both the
Boilerplater compiler and the core object model and have started on
search
classes by the deadline. That, in addition to finishing provisional
implementations for real-time search, a pluggable IndexReader, and
memory-mapped sort caches generated at index time (all done), as
discussed
during the flurry of design posts to lucy-dev this spring.
I will finish the last of the commits, update the Lucy website (now
that
there's actually news), and file that report by tomorrow.
Marvin Humphrey
On Jun 10, 2009, at 9:09 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Lucene's Board Report is due in the coming days (meeting is on the
24th). Please fill in for your project by the 16th.
The report is in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/board-reports/2009/board-report-june-2009.txt
-Grant
