general  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: New LuSolr trunk (was: RE: (LUCENE-2297) IndexWriter should let you optionally enable reader pooling) Yonik Seeley
• [ANN] Apache Mahout 0.3 Released Robin Anil
  • [ANNOUNCE] Apache Mahout 0.3 Released Robin Anil
• AC NA 2010 - Lucene Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: AC NA 2010 - Lucene Noirin Shirley
  • Re: AC NA 2010 - Lucene Grant Ingersoll
• Fwd: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Simon Willnauer
  • Re: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Isabel Drost
  • Re: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: Fwd: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Chris Hostetter
• Re: [VOTE]: release Mahout 0.3 (resend, I forgot [email protected]) Grant Ingersoll
• Less drastic ways Otis Gospodnetic
  • Re: Less drastic ways Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: Less drastic ways Otis Gospodnetic
  • Re: Less drastic ways Michael McCandless
  • Re: Less drastic ways Otis Gospodnetic
  • Re: Less drastic ways Michael McCandless
  • Re: Less drastic ways Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: Less drastic ways Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: Less drastic ways Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: Less drastic ways Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: Less drastic ways Doug Cutting
  • Re: Less drastic ways Chris Hostetter
• Umbrella Projects WAS: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Bernd Fondermann
  • Re: Umbrella Projects Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: Umbrella Projects Andrzej Bialecki
  • Re: Umbrella Projects Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: Umbrella Projects Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
• Re: Problem when the synonym has 2 words Claudio R
  • Re: Problem when the synonym has 2 words Robert Muir
  • Re: Problem when the synonym has 2 words Simon Willnauer
• Berlin Buzzwords - Call for presentations Simon Willnauer
• Re: How to do prefix/phrase matching with term-length-sensitive scoring? Chris Hostetter
• Board Report Due Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: Board Report Due Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: Board Report Due Marvin Humphrey
  • Board Report Due Grant Ingersoll
  • RE: Board Report Due Digy
  • Re: Board Report Due Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: Board Report Due Grant Ingersoll
  • Board Report Due Grant Ingersoll
  • Board Report Due Grant Ingersoll
• Re: final lucene/solr merge vote is up Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
• Re: Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap Mike Klaas
  • Re: Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap Otis Gospodnetic
• [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael Busch
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael Busch
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Ted Dunning
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) - can we take a pause? Ian Holsman
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Ted Dunning
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Chris Hostetter
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Simon Willnauer
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Andrzej Bialecki
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael McCandless
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Andrzej Bialecki
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael McCandless
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Andrzej Bialecki
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael McCandless
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Robert Muir
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Robert Muir
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Robert Muir
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Robert Muir
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael Busch
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael Busch
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Jason Rutherglen
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • RE: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Granroth, Neal V.
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael McCandless
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mike Klaas
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Ian Holsman
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Shalin Shekhar Mangar
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael McCandless
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Jukka Zitting
  • RE: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Uwe Schindler
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Andi Vajda
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Ryan McKinley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Bernd Fondermann
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Bernd Fondermann
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Simon Willnauer
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Simon Willnauer
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael Busch
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Michael McCandless
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Yonik Seeley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Simon Willnauer
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Bernd Fondermann
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Otis Gospodnetic
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Mark Miller
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) patrick o'leary
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Bernd Fondermann
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Dennis Kubes
• Board Report Due for Meeting on Wed, 17 March 2010 Grant Ingersoll
• Re: Composing posts for both JIRA and email (was a JIRA post) Michael McCandless
  • Re: Composing posts for both JIRA and email (was a JIRA post) Marvin Humphrey
  • Re: Composing posts for both JIRA and email (was a JIRA post) Michael McCandless
• Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Doug Cutting
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Doug Cutting
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Yonik Seeley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Ryan McKinley
  • Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Grant Ingersoll
• Re: Q re merging dev MLs Mark Miller
  • Re: Q re merging dev MLs Doug Cutting
  • Re: Q re merging dev MLs Chris Hostetter
• Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Robert Muir
  • Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Bill Au
  • Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
  • Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Michael Busch
  • Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Chris Hostetter
  • Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Chris Hostetter
  • Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Erik Hatcher
  • Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Koji Sekiguchi
  • Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Ryan McKinley
• Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 (nag) Andi Vajda
  • Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 (nag) Grant Ingersoll
  • Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 (nag) Grant Ingersoll

• Later messages