I think someone has already pointed this out before. On numerous occasions I have had to dig into the Lucene code when writing code to extend Solr. So it will be much earier to make sure that I am looking at the right code if Solr uses an official release of Lucene, as opposed to a particular SVN revision.
Bill On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]>wrote: > Yeah, unfortunately, I think we need to use the new Jars. > > > On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yes, it's too bad! >>> >>> But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before releasing? >>> Because it would not be good to have jar files with version 2.9.1 in the >>> package that are not the officially released 2.9.1 artifacts. >>> >> >> Darn... forgot about the version number in the jars. >> Sigh. >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> > > >
