On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Bill Au <[email protected]> wrote: > I think someone has already pointed this out before. On numerous occasions > I have had to dig into the Lucene code when writing code to extend Solr. So > it will be much earier to make sure that I am looking at the right code if > Solr uses an official release of Lucene, as opposed to a particular SVN > revision.
And it's much easier for people to use a Solr release if we could actually *release* one!!! But yes, it looks like we will spin a new Solr release. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com > Bill > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Yeah, unfortunately, I think we need to use the new Jars. >> >> >> On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, it's too bad! >>>> >>>> But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before releasing? >>>> Because it would not be good to have jar files with version 2.9.1 in the >>>> package that are not the officially released 2.9.1 artifacts. >>>> >>> >>> Darn... forgot about the version number in the jars. >>> Sigh. >>> >>> -Yonik >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
