Hi, I am using Lucene3.0 for my project. I used FieldCacheRangeFilter (Static method newLongRange()) with NumericRangeQuery in one implementation of dateRangeQuery search and only NumericRangeQuery for another implementation of dateRangeQuery search. I found 17525 documents via both implementation but search time via FieldCacheRangeFilter was 172milliseconds while via NumericRangeQuery search it was 62milliseconds.
I got confused because i was expecting that FieldCacheRangeFilter do search faster. Why it happened please explain. ----- Romi -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/FieldCacheRangeFilter-Vs-NumericRangeQuery-tp2038419p2038419.html Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
