Hi, I run search using FieldChacheFilter and NumericRangeFilter and i am getting the similar results. Searchtime is same in both the cases. My index size is 10000000 documents. My point is :
1. When search is performed using FieldCacheFilter then it caches the first query search result and so next query searches becomes fast. But its not the case with NumericRangeFilter then Why i am getting the same search time in both implementations. 2. I want to know in which case i should use filters. I am performing searches on DateRanges. User just enters a date to search the required document, will it b benificial to use filter in this case. As far as i know filters should use when u want to apply some constraints( eg. hide documents which are of "high security") , but in my case too seaching is very fast in case of filter. Should i really use filter? ----- Romi -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/FieldCacheRangeFilter-Vs-NumericRangeQuery-tp2038419p2057294.html Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
