> > Looking in CVS Web I found this sql.c comment for v1.4 (ram) very suspicios: > > Document rating store in pos field of wrd[] = n_uniq_words > > According to this, rating always will be 1 for one-word searches, since > uniq word is always equal 1. Rating is totally meaningless in this case! > Moreover, for many-words searches it is not good too, sice can't > distinguish between (300 word1 + 300 word2) document and (word1 + word2) > document. Document ordering takes it in account. Take a look into doc/relevancy.txt what factors take part in ordering. If you have an idea of how to compose function which can give document relevancy in persents, please share it. It must take in account all factors explained in relevancy.txt. And it also must give always the same persentage for the same document when the same words are searched, does not matter whether tag, URL or other limits are given. So, we can't just give 100% for the best document. > Please reconsider this move. > ___________________________________________ If you want to unsubscribe send "unsubscribe general" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
