������ ������ wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 13:15:48 +0400, Alexander Barkov wrote: > > Document ordering takes it in account. Take a look into > > doc/relevancy.txt > > what factors take part in ordering. If you have an idea of how to > > compose > > function which can give document relevancy in persents, please share it. > > I not complain about document _ordering_, it is fine for me. I complain > about "rating" displayed. Lets say we have two documents, one have 1000 > words "example" and another one have single word "example". Assume that > 1000 words document is ordered first (I don't check it), but displayed > "rating" for both of them is "1" (count of unique words) which is > senseless. > > For displayed rating (not for ordering) I have idea to desplay sum of all > (not unique only) occurances of all words searched. It is possible if .pos > will be not overwritted later in UdmGroupByURL(). > I think we can add another search template variable which will represent this. P.S. I would prefer relevancy persentage, but we can invent a fucntion for it :-( ___________________________________________ If you want to unsubscribe send "unsubscribe general" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
