Author: jussi Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: May be I was too hasty. After more detailed investigation, 3.2.x relevancy is comparable to 3.1.x
Anyhow, reading manuals and doc-files I haven't found where do these big values (e.g. 117506048, 50397184, 33619968,...) come from? Moreover, 3.1.x used to combine folder/index page into one result: *http://domain.fi/folder/subfolder/index.htm (text/html) Tue, 05 Feb 2002 10:39:49 GMT, 69119 bytes *http://domain.fi/folder/subfolder/ (text/html) Tue, 05 Feb 2002 10:39:49 GMT Is there gonna be a similar fix in 3.2.x? /jussi Reply: <http://www.mnogosearch.org/board/message.php?id=4143> ___________________________________________ If you want to unsubscribe send "unsubscribe general" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
