Author: Alexander Barkov Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: > May be I was too hasty. > After more detailed investigation, 3.2.x relevancy is comparable to 3.1.x > > Anyhow, reading manuals and doc-files I haven't found where do these big values >(e.g. 117506048, 50397184, 33619968,...) come from?
It is internal mnogosearch number, used for sorting. Soon, we'll rewrite relevance output code. It is on of most important task for our nearest TODO. > Moreover, 3.1.x used to combine folder/index page into one result: > *http://domain.fi/folder/subfolder/index.htm (text/html) Tue, 05 Feb 2002 10:39:49 >GMT, 69119 bytes > *http://domain.fi/folder/subfolder/ (text/html) Tue, 05 Feb 2002 10:39:49 GMT > Is there gonna be a similar fix in 3.2.x? It should work. The only possible problem is that you use old 3.1.x style "Clones" command. We renamed "Clones" command to "DetectClones" to make it's meaning more clean. So, you should use DetectClones yes in both search.htm and indexer.conf Reply: <http://www.mnogosearch.org/board/message.php?id=4183> ___________________________________________ If you want to unsubscribe send "unsubscribe general" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
