At 05:07 PM 8/29/2006 -0700, Ted Leung wrote:
On Aug 29, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
Hmmm. Ok, so Ted has been making this same argument.
The term is less important to me than the concept. Of the terms you
suggested Phillip, "Preview" sounds most appealing.
Thoughts?
If we have to have a label, then I would be fine with Preview, but
I'm not convinced that we need to attach the label directly to the
release. We can talk about a Preview release in announcements and
blog posts, but that's different from having artifacts labeled
something like Chandler_iosx_0.7Preview.dmg.
Right, I should've been more explicit that this is what I meant. "Preview"
and the like would be *marketing* labels, not technical ones. The version
number used on development artifacts should be just plain old "0.7" for the
final release of 0.7.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
