At 06:06 PM 8/29/2006 -0700, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
Perhaps both Cosmo and Chandler could use the "m" notation for milestones between releases?
I'd personally prefer to stick with using "alpha" to denote interim releases, as I believe those are more widely-understood terms for the audience(s) that those releases are directed at, and because of the cost/benefit of making such a change. But that might just be because I'm not seeing what the benefit is; it's not as if Cosmo and Chandler are using a common technology platform for creating releases. Perhaps the intended benefit of consolidation lies somewhere else that I'm not immediately seeing?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
