On 01/03/07, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Stefano,
I do disagree on several of your points, but it would be getting bikesheddy raising them here. But I accept what you say regarding Javascript & GRDDL, I'm gonna have to think (and maybe play) around that one a bit. GRDDL is now heading towards Last Call, but if you're getting a "left as an exercise to the reader" taste that should be addressed. One minor correction: > "Buy in "is not the same as "pay for it". They can very well use GRDDL > transformers written and maintained by third parties, but GRDDL will > work if they will put a link to that transformation in their pages. The publishers only have to link to a profile doc, that profile can link to the transformation (or to another profile...). This works well with microformats, as they all (will, one day...) have profiles, and HTML good practice would suggest the reference to the profile URI. > The act of adding that single line to the page templates is very little > work in most cases. The act of convincing the data owners to spend time > understanding the implications of their action is *far* from it. Yep, that's definitely the tricky part (as well as the other side of the implication, the need to have GRDDL transformations produce RDF that faithfully represents the intended data model). > Sorry if I sounded harsh, it has nothing to do with you Danny, but you > accidentally stepped on one of my nerves ;-) Don't worry, I appreciate you taking the trouble to put the points. Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
