right; i think noscript is the way to go; i was just hoping for some reassurance that it wouldn't penalize page ranks.
David Huynh wrote: > Google does seem to see the content within <noscript> on my publications > page: > > http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:wB02cOTR5I8J:people.csail.mit.edu/dfhuynh/publications.html+david+huynh+time+quilt&hl=en&strip=1 > > I wonder if the links in there get penalized, though. > > David > > David Karger wrote: > >> I asked friends at google how they would react to using noscript to show >> exhibit content, and got this limited response: >> >> >> >>> } any chance you can comment on this, or find someone who can? >>> } I am skeptical that you would penalize noscript, since it is an >>> } important accessibility option, but it's worth knowing. >>> >>> I think we already comment on everything we can, about what factors >>> the google search engine thinks make for a good page: >>> http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769 >>> >>> It doesn't mention noscript, alas, but I don't think we'd be able to >>> get more specific than what's on that page. >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> General mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general > _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
