Hello Jakub,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 4/25/07, Ryan Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why is it that Longwell 2.4.2 doesn't build for you?
> 
> Longwell 2.4.2 build stops with the following message (it is not a proxy
> problem):
> 
> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] The plugin 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin' does not
> exist or no valid version could be found

Odd.  Perhaps this thread might be of some use (unlikely since the error 
doesn't appear to affect Longwell 2.4):

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg66536.html

>> I am curious about your use of Longwell that requires frequent updates
>> to existing data.
> 
> I thought about using Longwell to browse a bunch of projects described in
> DOAP files. The files won't change that frequently I guess but still, it
> would be nicer to avoid having to stop longwell and create a new repository
> each time some of the files changes (or each cycle in which I would check
> for changes).

There was a proposal on the list some time ago to use Sesame contexts 
and switch out an old context for an updated one while keeping Longwell 
running.  I don't know what happened with that idea.

I should note that using two different applications to work with the raw 
files of a triple store simultaneously seems iffy (I'd take down 
Longwell before running a separate update)...

>> I wouldn't recommend it, per se.  There are layers in Longwell on top of
>> Sesame that may (or may not, I don't recall specifics for the 2.4.2
>> release at the moment) get out of sync with the triple store if you
>> modify it at that lower level.
> 
> Ok, I'll try and see I guess :)

...but I don't suppose that will stop you ;)

-- 
Ryan Lee                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIT CSAIL Research Staff  http://simile.mit.edu/
http://people.csail.mit.edu/ryanlee/
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to