Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > A few months ago, we identified a major performance degradation issue > with Longwell and we fixed it (basically one way of querying the triple > store with another). > > Unfortunately, the two queries are not idempotent in all situations and > this resulted in a seriously broken Longwell functionality. Mark > Wilkinson unfortunately ran into this problem. > > I've spent the entire day to find where the problem (performing binary > search backtracking on all the longwell revisions to understand what > broke it) was and fixed it in the latest Longwell trunk in svn.
Nice job. Thanks for taking care of it, I don't know if I'd have the stomach to go into that codebase again so soon. Though it does sound like it's time for another Piggy Bank release - unless you wanted to see the other issue you mentioned addressed first. -- Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIT CSAIL Research Staff http://simile.mit.edu/ http://people.csail.mit.edu/ryanlee/ _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
