I second that! thanks for taking the time and effort! Mark
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:56:38 -0700, Ryan Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >> A few months ago, we identified a major performance degradation issue >> with Longwell and we fixed it (basically one way of querying the triple >> store with another). >> >> Unfortunately, the two queries are not idempotent in all situations and >> this resulted in a seriously broken Longwell functionality. Mark >> Wilkinson unfortunately ran into this problem. >> >> I've spent the entire day to find where the problem (performing binary >> search backtracking on all the longwell revisions to understand what >> broke it) was and fixed it in the latest Longwell trunk in svn. > > Nice job. Thanks for taking care of it, I don't know if I'd have the > stomach to go into that codebase again so soon. > > Though it does sound like it's time for another Piggy Bank release - > unless you wanted to see the other issue you mentioned addressed first. > _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
