Mark Feblowitz wrote: > I strongly second this. Simple facets push all such natural > hierarchies into much less natural property structures. I suspect > many of us would appreciate some kind of hierarchical representation of > facets. > Let's work together on this: If you could provide me with an exhibit with data in need of hierarchical facets and tell me how such facets should work, then I'll try to implement it. It's always better to work with realistic data.
> While we're waiting, are there any good examples out there of using > properties as a surrogate to facet structuring? > I'm not sure what you meant... Could you explain? David _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
